CAA Article 131 Clarifications

CAA is now moved to the court by desperate  Kerala government. It is clear sign of frustration and the on going struggling is only to establish a connection with a section of the Citizens of a particular community realizing the damage it has already done during it's irresponsible decisions, intentions and actions on time to time during last three 3 and half years.

Every move of opposition will only help India in disguise as India decade after decades,  year after years, month after months, week after weeks and day after day are getting matured and are successfully smelling and distinguishing the rights and wrongs, truths and values. and also the nation's need of the hour to understand the hidden agendas of various political parties.

Now coming to CAA moved to Supreme Court by Kerala government, I point out the below points will be the highlight of the arguments and counter-arguments.

• 1st point raised "CAA overlooks issues of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar and Srilanka. 
• Reply. (1) Rohingya Muslims fled Myanmar not due to their facing Religious atrocities but due to the atrocities Myanmar citizens faced through Rohingyas. Reply (2) India is not on a charity mode, in case Myanmar Rohingyas has issue with their country, they must prefer to move to Islamic countries like Bangladesh, Malaysia, Indonesia as India got divided on Religious ground and hence India already had positively considered and accepted the demand of Islamic nation, accepting Muslims to India trespassing nearby Islamic countries cannot be accepted. 
• 2nd point raised. CAA does not consider Tamils in Srilanka, Hindu Madhesis in Terai Nepal..? 
• (Reply) CAA is purely targeting religious atrocities not language-based. Further, the Tamils of Srilanka were involved in anti-government activities and hence they could not be considered as India should not stand with any citizen of any country who are rebellious against their elected government. It gives the wrong message to the country (Reply 2). Hindus of Nepal are not facing religious atrocities, as Nepal is a Hindu majority country which recently has become a secular nation. So CAA does not cover Nepal either. 
• 3rd point raised. Hazaras of Afganistan, Christians of Bhutan and Srilanka and Buddhists from Nepal for citizenship. 
• (Reply) Hazaras are a caste in Islam (among Muslims) Hazaras are Shia Muslims in a Sunni Majority Afganistan. So it is a caste-based issue within the Religion which is the countries internal issue. It does not come under Religious atrocities. For example In India if any unfortunate caste discrimination takes place between so-called Brahmins and so-called Dalits then it will not be considered as a "Religious atrocity or Religious differences, but it is "Caste discrimination"

• 4th Point raised. Why CAA does not cover "Ethnic Indians" in Malaysia and Fiji?
• (Reply) There are no atrocities faced by any in Malaysia. This is the strength of CAA and one of the best example to prove the very purpose of the Bill. It is not to appease any Religion neither to demoralize any Religion, hence Malayasia though is a Muslim country which has 86.2% Hindus (Indian Malayasian)
• 5th Point raised. The plea says CAA is manifestly arbitrary and unconstitutional as it violates secularism and right to equality. 
• (Reply)  It is no way against secularism as it has not made any discrimination at all. Muslims has been excluded only due to the reason "Muslims" in any of these countries are not "minorities' and are not subjected to "Religious atrocities". In a nutshell, the CAA could have been passed without naming any of the Religions on the same, Like, "CAA gives citizenship to any citizens of these three countries who are displaced due to Religious atrocities in that country. If the bill has passed without any mentioning of any of the Religion, then automatically the effect of the bill remains the same as any of these countries Muslims could not face religious atrocities in an Islamic nation.

Sudesh DJV

Indore MP India

15th Jan 2020

9:40 am

Sudesh DJV writes on contemporary subjects in the form of Articles and poems which is in the interest of the Nation in particular and for Mankind in general.